Supreme Court has reiterated that proceedings initiated to review a judgment should not be confused with appeal proceedings. A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and S V N Bhatti cautioned that courts ought not mix up review jurisdiction with appellate jurisdiction . It said that a review petition has a limited purpose and could not be permitted to function as an appeal in disguise .
"The review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. Review is not to be confused with appellate powers, which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be reheard and corrected," the court said.
"The review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC. Review is not to be confused with appellate powers, which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court. In exercise of the jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, it is not permissible for an erroneous decision to be reheard and corrected," the court said.
You may also like
Top 10 richest Americans in 2025: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg and other billionaires shaping the US wealth
UAE: British law student sentenced to 25 years in Dubai prison after 50 grams of cocaine found in apartment
Who is Elizabeth Tsurkov? Israeli-Russian graduate freed after 903 days in Hezbollah captivity
'Game changer' viral gel-cream moisturiser that reduces wrinkles in seven days
Why Djed Spence made Harry Kane emotional as Thomas Frank sent clear Tottenham message